Showing posts with label Books. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Books. Show all posts

Thursday, October 17, 2013

Reasons the Trailer Thinks You Want To See The Hobbit 2



  • Middle Earth
  • More Middle Earth
  • Hey, guys, look, it's Middle Earth!
  • LEE PACE!
  • Richard Armitage, did anyone really forget about Richard Armitage?
  • The barrel scene, everyone.
  • Like, a really intense barrel scene
  • This is not the barrel scene from your childhood
  • Oh yeah, and by the way LEGOLAS
  • Bet you didn't see that coming
  • AND not only is Legolas in this movie but he also has an ELF GIRLFRIEND
  • WHO IS ALSO KATE FROM LOST
  • *who was not in the book*
  • An elf girlfriend who can fight.... really good.... hmmmm, where did I see that before?
  • Sauron is totally not the Necromancer, nope, not even a little bit
  • Gandalf with a sword
  • LEE PACE'S EYEBROWS!!!!!1!
  • Freaky close-up of Lee Pace's elaborate and grey-tinged eyebrows
  • *sweeping dramatic eyebrow shot*'
  • Did we mention Lee Pace was in this movie and he has eyebrows?
  • That pale orc you either didn't care about or hated because he wasn't in the book
  • Giant spiders
  • Aramis from Three Musketeers is Bard for anyone who actually watched Three Musketeers  (or remembers Bard in the first place)
  • Wizard fighting
  • Legolas shooting things at really, really close range
  • Fighting in the barrels during the barrel scene. Bet you don't remember that part! *Fanboys shriek and scream and dissolve in incoherent puddles of rage*
  • And let's not forget about the amazing, spectacular, stunning CGI dragon....
  • PSYCH! It's actually just Benedict Cumberbatch wearing heavy makeup
  • COMING DECEMBER 13 
  • IN 3D 
  • Also 2D for the peasants
  • BUT MOSTLY 3D!!!!
"Hey, wasn't, like, that Bilbo guy supposed to be the star of this movie or something?"

Monday, September 17, 2012

Genre Favorites: the Blogfest

Today I'm participating in Alex J. Cavanaugh's Genre Favorites Blogfest. The goal: list your favorite genre of movie, music and books, as well as a guilty pleasure genre.

Now, I love a lot of genres in literature, and I love a lot of stories that cross genres, or can't be classified in a genre, so it was a little hard picking just one. The most important things in a story for me are the message and the characters, so I can enjoy a story in almost any genre if these two elements are in place. But there are a few genres I enjoy more than others. Here are some of my favorites:

via IMDb
Movie - Science fiction

One thing I love about science fiction is that, unlike fantasy, it's something that might, just possibly, someday be true (look at Jules Verne's stories). This combination of reality and semi-plausable fiction makes sci-fi movies a lot of fun to watch. On the flip side, I also enjoy the sci-fi movies that pose a question that challenges your perception of reality. I think those are some of the most powerful movies. Some of my favorites in this genre are Star Wars, The Matrix, and Iron Man.

via IMDb
Music - Soundtrack

No contest here. This is the genre in which I most consistently find songs (and even whole albums) that I like. One of the things I love most about soundtrack music is that it's written to evoke specific emotions that tell a story. I tend to favor the composers (like John Williams) that have sweeping orchestral accompaniments. Some of my favorite soundtrack composers are Steve Jablonsky (Transformers), Hans Zimmer (Pirates of the Carribean, Kung Fu Panda, the Batman trilogy, among lots of other things), and John Powell (How to Train Your Dragon and the Bourne movies). I've also been listening to Alan Silvestri's Avengers soundtrack alot. Good stuff there.
via Goodreads

Books - Mystery

Mystery will always have a special place in my heart. I spent maybe two or three months when I was 14 reading through the rest of the Sherlock Holmes stories, all the Lord Peter Wimsey stories, and a lot of the Hercule Poirot and Miss Marple mysteries. But I started reading Sherlock Holmes when I was 7 or 8, and he'll always be my favorite detective.

via Goodreads

And a guilty pleasure genre from any of the three categories:

Comic books. Especially the ones from the "golden age" of comics in the 60's. I love them for the same reason I love reading fairytales - its about good and evil in a simple, uncomplicated form. The first comic book I ever read was the very first Spider-man comic, and I'll always love those. I also enjoyed the original Fantastic Four comics, and some of the early Avengers comics. The newer ones can't really compare.

What are some of your favorite genres?

Friday, June 8, 2012

H2WaMM: the Prologue


I'm no murder mystery expert.

Actually, I really prefer the non-violent mysteries (thievery, forgery, etc.) But the murder mystery is the most famous (and the largest) genre of mystery, so I've decided to focus on that.

Welcome to How to Write a Murder Mystery.

Me and murder mysteries go way back. I have read all sixty canonical  Sherlock Holmes stories, a goodly amount of Agatha Christie, nearly every Peter Wimsey, seen every episode of Psych... 

However, I've never written a (serious) one.

Wait a minute, Lauren, you say, why are you telling us how to write a murder mystery if you've never even written one yourself??

The answer: I'm not. I won't be telling you how to write a murder mystery. Instead I'll be attempting to show you.

Yes, my readers, I have written a three-act murder mystery that will give you the formula to write a formulaic MM. I have left no trope untouched, no cliche unturned. 

This three-act mystery will star our two generic heroes, Detective and Sidekick. They will be hired by Client to discover who killed Victim. And of course we'll have Bumbling Inspector, Sheltered Woman, and Heartless Murderer, as well as a good smattering of Suspicious Suspects.

It's a big cliche-fest, so get ready to gather round and prepare to predict what happens next. Hopefully you'll see murder mysteries in a way you never have before. Or at least you'll have a good time.

Either way, be prepared for next Friday, when I will present for your pleasure H2WaMM: Act One.

Are you a murder mystery fan, or more of a non-violent mystery fan? How many murder mysteries have you read? Ever written a murder mystery? What murder mystery cliches have always bugged you?

Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Teaser Tuesdays: The Help


This post is for Teaser Tuesdays, a weekly event from the blog Should Be Reading.

The Help has been languishing on my nightstand for over a month. Now that my classes are finished and I have a little more time I've decided to pick it up.

Most of you have probably already read it, so this won't be much of a "teaser" but for those of you who haven't, here it is:
"Baby Girl, she looking at the door her daddy slammed, she looking at her mama frowning down at her. My baby, she swallowing it back, like she trying real hard not to cry. I rush past Miss Leefolt, pick Baby Girl up."
 This is the section that's in Aibileene's point of view. I love the relationship between Aibileene and the baby, Mae Mobley. So far I'm about six chapters in and really enjoying the book.

And hey! I'm studying for the US History II CLEP right now, which covers 1865 to the present. So since The Help is set in the 1960's, reading it counts as studying, right?

Have you read The Help? Do you have a book that's been languishing on your nightstand? What are you currently reading?

Saturday, April 28, 2012

Y is for Yes, More T.S. Eliot

Four QuartetsFour Quartets by T.S. Eliot
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

I know I've mentioned this already, but I do love T.S. Eliot. His poetry isn't the kind that you understand right away. It's not light reading, but it's beautiful.

Four Quartets is, without a doubt, my favorite of his collected poetry that I've read so far. Wasteland was beautiful, wild, crazy, and deep, but Four Quartets is much more soulful. It was also written after his conversion to the Anglican church, so it has a lot of religious and spiritual themes, a lot more than Wasteland did.

The book is arranged into four separate poems: Burnt Norton, East Coker, The Dry Salvages, and Little Gidding.

When reading T.S. Eliot, my routine is usually this:

  •  Read once, just listening to and enjoying rhythm and sounds of words
  •  Read again, this time looking for the meaning
  •  Read the third time, trying to make sure I understood the right meaning
  • Read again, understand enough to move on

That's actually a lot like how you're supposed to read the Bible. Read, digest, read, digest.

I'll leave you with some bits of poetry from the book:

The wounded surgeon plies the steel
That questions the distempered part;
Beneath the bleeding hands we feel
The sharp compassion of the healer’s art
Resolving the enigma of the fever chart.

Our only health is the disease
If we obey the dying nurse
Whose constant care is not to please
But to remind us of our, and Adam’s curse,
And that, to be restored, our sickness must grow worse.

- From East Coker

I said to my soul, be still and wait without hope,
For hope would be hope for the wrong thing; wait without love,
For love would be love of the wrong thing; there is yet faith,
But the faith and the love are all in the waiting.
Wait without thought, for you are not ready for thought:
So the darkness shall be the light, and the stillness the dancing.

- From Burnt Norton

For most of us, there is only the unattended
Moment, the moment in and out of time,
The distraction fit, lost in a shaft of sunlight,
The wild thyme unseen, or the winter lightning
Or the waterfall, or music heard so deeply
That it is not heard at all, but you are the music
While the music lasts. 

- From The Dry Salvages

We shall not cease from exploration, 
And the end of all our exploring 
Will be to arrive where we started 
And know the place for the first time.

- From Little Gidding

Have you read any T.S. Eliot? Have a favorite book of poetry? Have a fixed way of reading poetry? Hate poetry? Love poetry?
Let me know by commenting!

Saturday, April 21, 2012

S is for Seven Books

I've read a lot of books on writing, but only a few have really impacted the way I think. 

Here are seven books that changed my perspective on writing:

Invisible Ink: A Practical Guide to Building Stories That ResonateInvisible Ink: A Practical Guide to Building Stories That Resonate by Brian McDonald

My rating: 5 of 5 stars

This is probably the best book on screenwriting I've read. I read it twice in a row the first time I picked it up, and I don't normally do that (especially with writing books). In clear, accessible terms, Brian McDonald explains the reasoning behind the choices that writers make - the "invisible ink" that holds the story together.

The Lively Art of WritingThe Lively Art of Writing by Lucile Vaughan Payne

My rating: 4 of 5 stars

This is one of the earliest books on writing that I read, and I really enjoyed it. It focuses on essays (the forms and how to craft arguments) and how to write descriptions, use active voice, and what to avoid when writing. It's one of my very favorite books.


The Elements of Story: Field Notes on Nonfiction WritingThe Elements of Story: Field Notes on Nonfiction Writing by Francis Flaherty

My rating: 4 of 5 stars

I stayed up much too late reading this book. The length of the chapters made it easy to read just one more.

Francis Flaherty believes that every article, whether it's about finance or medicine or anything in between, is a story, with actors who feel things and do things, and the key to good writing is to identify and bring out the human elements.

The book, though aimed mostly at journalists, contains practical advice on crafting interesting stories that all writers can use. I would definitely recommend this book to anyone writing non-fiction.

Screen Teen Writers: How Young Screenwriters Can Find SuccessScreen Teen Writers: How Young Screenwriters Can Find Success by Christina Hamlett

My rating: 4 of 5 stars

A very easy-to-read, informative book on screenwriting (geared toward teens). It inspired me to read more books on writing.

The Art of Fiction: Notes on Craft for Young WritersThe Art of Fiction: Notes on Craft for Young Writers by John Gardner

My rating: 3 of 5 stars

I believe this was the first book on writing I ever read, and I still have fond memories of it. A good book on the "art" of fiction. He uses a metaphor that I wholeheartedly agree with - that a story should be like a "dream" for the reader, and that you want to do everything possible to keep them in the dream and not disturb them by putting yourself or anything unnecessary in the story.

77 Reasons Why Your Book Was Rejected77 Reasons Why Your Book Was Rejected by Mike Nappa

My rating: 4 of 5 stars

An excellent book on how to (as far as possible) avoid rejection. The author can sometimes be a little harsh (he even apologizes for it at the end of the book) but most of the time it's on topics that writers need to hear. I would highly, highly recommend this book for anyone who's serious about getting published.

The Screenwriter's Bible: A Complete Guide to Writing, Formatting, and Selling Your ScriptThe Screenwriter's Bible: A Complete Guide to Writing, Formatting, and Selling Your Script by David Trottier

My rating: 4 of 5 stars

A well-written, comprehensive book on screenwriting. It taught me a lot about writing dialogue and crafting tight narratives, as well as the terms, rules, and general observances of screenwriting. I would highly recommend it, right after Invisible Ink.


What are some books that changed your perspective on writing?

Thursday, April 19, 2012

Q is for Quotes


I love quotes. I love when someone says something so true about something so well that it can all be condensed into one or two sentences. Yes, you can quote me on that. ;)

Here are a few of my favorite quotes

(If you want to read more quotes I like, I have a page dedicated to them.)


“A writer is someone for whom writing is more difficult than it is for other people.”
Thomas Mann


“If there's a book that you want to read, but it hasn't been written yet, then you must write it.”
Toni Morrison


“Atheism turns out to be too simple. If the whole universe has no meaning, we should never have found out that it has no meaning...”
C.S. Lewis


“The fool doth think he is wise, but the wise man knows himself to be a fool.”
William Shakespeare 


“Fantasy is the impossible made probable. Science fiction is the improbable made possible.”
Rod Sterling


“Still, it doesn't do to murder people, no matter how offensive they may be.”
Dorothy L. Sayers


“Fiction does not spring into the world fully grown, like Athena. It is the process of writing and rewriting that makes a fiction original, if not profound.”
John Gardner


“We are not necessarily doubting that God will do the best for us; we are wondering how painful the best will turn out to be.”
C.S. Lewis


“I began to get really keen, for every man at the bottom of his heart believes that he is a born detective.”
John Buchan


“When you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”
Arthur Conan Doyle


“Reading is one form of escape. Running for your life is another.” —Lemony Snicket

Do you have a favorite quote? I'd love to hear it!

Saturday, April 14, 2012

M is for Mysteries of Udolpho

The Mysteries of UdolphoThe Mysteries of Udolpho by Ann Radcliffe

My rating: 3 of 5 stars


"Emily gazed long on the splendours of the world she was quitting, of which the whole magnificence seemed thus given to her sight only to increase her regret on leaving it; for her, Valancourt alone was in that world; to him alone her heart turned, and for him alone fell her bitter tears.”

When I first read Northanger Abbey I thought that the Gothic novel referenced in the book, Mysteries of Udolpho, was made up.

Then, a couple of years later, I decided to see if it was real. Lo and behold, it was! I downloaded it for free off Project Gutenberg (link to the book here) and began to read it.

Emily St. Aubert is a young lady who lives with her parents in a villa in Gascony. Having a father who quit "society" to live a secluded life in the country, her daily activities consist in taking long walks in the woods, playing the lute and singing, reading and writing romantic poetry, reading romantic authors, and fainting in random spots.

No, just kidding about that last one. Fainting is more of a weekly occurrence for Emily than a daily one.

Then, after living their happy peaceful lives, tragedy strikes. Emily's mother becomes ill and dies (for reasons of which I'm still not sure) and, after some fainting, weeping, and sighing, she and her father decide to go on a vacation to help her father's ailing health.

After wandering around the Pyrenees for a while, admiring the views, painting, sketching, writing and reciting romantic poetry, and sighing over the beauty of the mountains, they run into a hitchhiker traveler named Valancourt, who is also wandering around the Pyrenees admiring the views.

Obviously, they get on well together, and they wander around and sigh over beauty (with Emily and Valancourt exchanging a few shy looks) until Valancourt decides to go his own way.

Then Emily and her father wander and sigh at the beautiful mountains some more (with a little bit of sighing over how Valancourt would love to look at these mountains) when their carriage is pursued by a lone horseman.

Monsieur St. Aubert is frightened - he thinks perhaps they are being chased by banditti - so he whips out his pistol and shoots the rider, who just happens to be... Valancourt!

The gun shot only broke his arm, however, and he is forced to stay with them a little longer and alas, has to be taken care of by Emily. What a tragedy.

Of course, they fall deeply in love, before Valancourt, after being healed, must rejoin his regiment, from which he was on leave.

Emily and her father are making their way home when Monsieur St. Aubert worsens, and they must stay in a villa (which holds a mysterious secret), until Monsieur St. Aubert dies. There is much weeping and sighing, and Emily almost decides to join a convent, but decides to go home instead.

Now that you've read this far you may skip book one and start directly with book two.

No, I'm serious. The novel is divided into four "books," and what I just described all takes place in the first book, accompanied by page after page after page of description and detail.

The second book is where the action really starts to happen. In fact, the entire novel could have started with the second book, instead of providing us with the immense backstory of the first.

In the second book, Emily goes to live with her aunt (who enjoys "society!" Oh the horror.) Emily's undiscerning aunt marries a rich man named Montoni. Surprise, surprise, Montoni is an evil Italian banditti lord who lives in the secluded Castle Udolpho, where he takes his new wife and niece.

This is where the book starts to get exciting. A great portion of the scenes inside Castle Udolpho had me holding my breath as Emily escaped danger after danger, discovered a mysterious secret, was held captive, was threatened, sighed, fainted, and wept.

Through it all, the only thing that keeps her going is that somewhere Valancourt is waiting for her, and her hope that someday they will be reunited.

For all I've made fun of it, Mysteries of Udolpho was a fun book to read, if a little tiring at times.

Emily is a strong heroine (despite all the fainting) and is intelligent, opinionated, and brave. Valancourt is a little more flawed - a little sappy and foolish - but he's all right as a character. Montoni is a truly good villain - I mean he's really good at being bad. He's frightening by being cool and calm and in control.

There is some really good suspense, but it's often disrupted by Anne Radcliffe's pageful of description of details that we don't really need, or interrupted by one of Emily's long poems that she recites for the reader's sake, poetry that has nothing whatsoever to do with the story.

I need to read Northanger Abbey again, because I can appreciate it more now that I've read the book it makes fun of.

It seems to me that Mysteries of Udolpho was the Twilight of its time, spawning a whole genre of copycat Gothic novels (none of which I'm planning to read!)

Someday I would really like to edit or abridge(or read an edited or abridged) Mysteries of Udolpho. It's got great potential, but to our modern ear for sparse, to-the-point prose, it just doesn't work.

However, don't let that deter you from reading it. If you can get past or ignore the descriptions, the poetry, and the long, unnecessary dialogue, it's a really fun and thrilling book.

Have you read Mysteries of Udolpho or any other Gothic novel? Have you read Northanger Abbey? Let me know by commenting!

Saturday, April 7, 2012

G is for Goodreads Reviews

I love Goodreads. I can search for the book I want, write a review, and then hit "publish to blog" without doing any work. It's so easy that I've decided that every Saturday during the A-to-Z Challenge I'll be reviewing a different book (and publishing it from Goodreads). 

I Serve: A Novel of the Black PrinceI Serve: A Novel of the Black Prince by Rosanne E. Lortz

My rating: 4 of 5 stars

I usually lump historical fiction into two categories: the kind that is mostly fiction with very little history, and the kind that is mostly history with very little fiction.

I Serve falls in between these two categories, leaning slightly more towards mostly history. It's this tendency, I think, that made I Serve a very enjoyable read.

I Serve tells the story of a young squire named John Potenhale who is knighted and becomes the attendant to the Black Prince. The story is set in the 1300's during the reign of Edward III of England. At that time England was involved in the Hundred Years' War with France.

The tale, told by Sir John Potenhale to the widow of a French Knight named Sir Geoffroi de Charny, begins with the English army landing in France. There Potenhale, then a squire serving an old knight named Sir Chandos, fights in his first battle and is knighted. He then becomes a member of the Prince's household.

Soon afterwards the ladies of the court in England visit the English camp in France. Among them is the prince's cousin, the Lady Joan of Kent. It is immediately apparent that the prince favors his lady cousin very much.

While delivering a note to the lady from the prince, Potenhale meets the lady-in-waiting Margery. He is instantly taken with her spirited manner and bright red hair.

Yet the love he desires is long in coming for Sir John Potenhale. Many obstacles stand in the way of his happiness, including the uncouth Sir Thomas Holland, Margery's loyalty to the Lady Joan and even Potenhale's own conscience.

When the Black Death strikes Europe, Potenhale, seeing it as a punishment for the world's sins, considers giving up knighthood and entering a monastery. But then, "torn between losing his soul and losing the love of his life, he finds friendship with a French knight who might - just possibly - help him save both."

I Serve would be an excellent resource for those interested in studying the Hundred Years' War or the Black Death, but it also stands by itself as a novel. Some of the rich descriptions thrust you straight into the action - take for example, the battle of Crecy:
It was no easy matter to reach Warwick. The slope of the hill had liquefied from the rain... I slipped several times in the mud as I dodged here and there to avoid encountering the enemy. One little man-at-arms gave chase, and I was forced to delay my mission to parry his blows. But the mud proved as treacherous to him as it had to me. His legs lost footing, and I drove my sword into the joints of his armor, right where the breastplate meets the helmet.
One of the things I appreciated most about this novel was that Potenhale was a very convincing character. He had fears, joys, and desires that I could identify with, but he was also historically accurate. Too often in historical fiction the main character has a modern mind-set. With Sir John Potenhale, this was not the case.

If you like your historical fiction with more history than fiction (like me) than you should enjoy I Serve. If you want to learn more about the Black Prince, the Hundred Year's War, or the Black Death, then I Serve will provide you with a unique and unforgettable way to see these events. or if you're just looking for a good book to while away an evening - well, what better way than to journey back to 13th century England for a little while?

Intrigued? You can buy the paperback or ebook here.

Also, today on the blog English Historical Fiction Authors Rose wrote a guest post on one of the main romances in the book, the love story of the Black Prince and Joan of Kent. Go check it out!

How do you like your historical fiction? More history, or more fiction? Are you interested in the time period that I Serve is set in? Ever read a book about the Black Prince?

Let me know by commenting! Happy Easter y'all!

Thursday, April 5, 2012

E is for Ebooks vs. Books (part 2)


It's time for part two of the Great Debate:

books vs. ebooks

Monday's post was on why I love books. Today I'm going to talk about what I love about ebooks, and whether or not I believe that real books will ever go away.

The first ebook I ever finished reading was The Hunger Games (you can read my review here).  I'd downloaded a few of the classics before, but I'd read them already, so I only got a few chapters into them

The Hunger Games isn't just one of those books you put down though, regardless of whether it's a book or an ebook.

So, what can you do with an ebook?

  • read it in the dark
  • turn pages with one hand
  • hold it in one hand
  • change the font, the size, and the background 
  • begin reading a book seconds after first hearing about it
  • self-publish cheaply 
  • search the book for your favorite character

The screen shot on the right is from my current read, The Mysteries of Udolpho.

Ebooks are easy to transport. Instead of packing a trunk or purse full of books, you can carry literally an entire library around in your pocket. I mean, that's really, really amazing.

That's like something you would only find in fantasy. Like Hermione's magic bag in Deathly Hallows.

E-readers make owning, collecting, and transporting books faster and easier than it's ever been before.

But do I believe that ebooks will eventually replace real books?

To answer that question, I want to draw some parallels from history.

When was the last time a major advancement was made in the way books were published and distributed?

That would be the invention of the printing press in 1440.

Before we had printed books, we had things called manuscripts, which were handwritten, largely by monks.

Only the very rich could own books because of the time it took to produce them.

And then Johannes Gutenberg invented a faster, easier way to print.

Now everyone could own and read books.

The Protestant Reformation was helped in a large part by the wide-spread distribution of the works of Luther and other Reformers, as well as copies of the Bible.

Sure, the books weren't as pretty as manuscripts, which took years and years to complete because of the painstaking illustrations and the beautiful handwriting of the monks. But now they could be read faster and for less.

Fast forward to today. Are ebooks going to oust real books the way real books ousted manuscripts?

I believe the answer is no. 

The reason that real books took over from manuscripts was because everyone could read them.

And, today, not everyone can afford an e-reader.

One of the main things that an e-reader requires is internet access, at least to initially buy books. Not everyone has internet access.

An e-reader requires access to electricity. Not everyone has that.

You see, anyone can pick up a book and read it. But, like I said in the last post, not everyone can realistically maintain ownership of an e-reader.

So until that day when everyone owns an e-reader...

I believe real books are here to stay.

What's your favorite thing about ebooks? Do you believe books and ebooks can coexist?

Let me know by commenting!

Tuesday, April 3, 2012

C is for Currently Reading


It's a challenge within a challenge!


Teaser Tuesdays is a weekly event from the blog Should Be Reading where bloggers (or even just readers) share two random sentences from their current read.

The book: Story Engineering: Mastering the 6 Core Competencies of Successful Writing by Larry Brooks

I absolutely love the cover of this book. I think I might buy it just because it would look so good on my shelf.

My random teaser sentences: (page 52)

If you can't come up with a succinct "what if?" question that defines your concept, consider that your story is not yet ready to write. It may be too complex, too vague and undefined, or at the other end of the spectrum, it may be lacking in dramatic potential.

I think I need to work on this. Right now my novel is taking more than two sentences to describe, so I've been trying to find the root and theme of the story. It's not helping that my main character is being boring and refusing to cooperate.

So far, Story Engineering is proving to be a really good book that's given me inspiration and insight into what I'm doing wrong.

I'm reading it slowly and taking lots of notes to make sure I don't miss anything - partly because it's a good book, and partly because the copy I have right now is a library book, and I have to give it back in about a week.

Have you read Story Engineering? If not, does this teaser make you want to read more?

What are you currently reading?

If you'd like to see (or enter) more of Should Be Reading's weekly events, click here.

Monday, April 2, 2012

B is for Books vs. Ebooks (part 1)


So I opened up my account today to see this post on the dashboard. Hopefully I'll have something a little different to say.

Today I'm going to tackle the Great Debate, the epic battle of...

books vs. ebooks


This will be a two part episode series in which I contrast and compare books and ebooks and try to resolve the burning question (no pun intended): are books a dead or dying medium?

Some say that nothing can compare to a real book. What does a real book have?
  • pages
  • substance
  • ink
  • smell
Besides, look what you can do with a real book:
  • Put it on a shelf
  • Dog ear the pages
  • Write in it
  • Put your nose in it
  • Hit people over the head with it
  • Throw it across the room when you get angry at it
Real books have smooth pages and sleek covers. They have spines that can be bent and they need real bookmarks and they can be signed by the author.

You can tell that a real book is good when it's worn and the dust jacket is falling off and there are notes scribbled all over it and there's chocolate on the pages (this happens all the time to me).

Without real books, there would be no more libraries (can you imagine a world without libraries?). There would be no more bookstores. There would be no more bookshelves full of colorful books.

Now, not everybody has an e-reader. Lots of people can't afford one, to start with, or haven't got around to buying one. Some people don't know how to use them. At my library, I've seen classes on how to use e-readers. Real books are pretty self-explanatory.

And you can't just hand a Kindle to anyone. To keep a Kindle you need access to electricity and digital money to purchase ebooks.

But a real book can be read by anyone, any time, as long as there's enough light to read by.

Real books can also be lent out as many times as you'd like. They can be passed around or given away when you've finished reading them.

Whether ebooks become the norm or not, real books will always hold a special place in my heart.

Because a Kindle just doesn't smell as nice as a real book.


What's your favorite thing about real books? Let me know by commenting!

Did you choose "books" as your topic for the letter "B"? If so, leave me a link so I can read it!

Check back on Thursday when I tackle the other side of the issue: ebooks.

By the way, my little sister wrote a pretty funny post on her typically odd art blog today. She needs more followers, so if you appreciate art and odd humor, go check it out!

Friday, March 23, 2012

Review: Mockingjay

Mockingjay
Mockingjay by Suzanne Collins

My rating: 4 of 5 stars

I enjoyed the Hunger Games trilogy. Real or not real?

Perhaps my four-star rating will tip you off.

Mockingjay opens with the Districts in open rebellion against the Capitol. Katniss is in... a place which I won't name because I don't want to give it away, along with refugees from her district and the rebel leaders. They ask her to become the face of the rebellion - the Mockingjay. Meanwhile, Katniss struggles with PTSD, numerous injuries, her worry over her friends and family, and a feeling of helplessness in the face of the war between the rebels and the Capitol.

The blurb on the book asks the question "will Katniss become the Mockingjay?" which is a much harder choice than it seems.

If Katniss becomes the Mockingjay, that implies that she agrees with everything the rebellion is doing, which she does not. If she refuses to become the Mockingjay, she risks not only being responsible for the loss of the war and the loss of morale, but for anything that happens to her family because of her refusal to join the rebellion.

To top it all off, Peeta Mellark is being held prisoner by the Capitol, and Katniss cannot seem to work out her feelings for Gale.

I think Mockingjay might be my favorite out of all of the books (even despite the violence). There's so much to talk about that I liked, so I hope this review won't be too long/boring.

Friday, March 2, 2012

The Hunger Games


Usually I review books on Goodreads and then click the "post to blog" button. But this book is special enough that it deserves its own post.

It seems like everyone has been doing a review on the Hunger Games lately. Here are just a few I've come across:

Rose at Read Room

Josiah from Biblical Beginnings

A guest post at Scripts, Scribbles and Such

I'm still waiting for Daniel's review (which I believe he promised us).

It's also the most read book on Goodreads right now.

The Hunger Games was first recommended to me by my friend Micah. She's a huge Doctor Who fan, so I knew I could trust her on sci-fi recommendations. Then I read Rose's review, and then my mom downloaded the ebook, and I knew I had to read it. Besides, I wanted to see the movie when it came out in March, but not without reading the book first.

I got three chapters into the book and put it away for a couple of days. I mean, the first sentence isn't exactly thrilling.

When I wake up, the other side of the bed is cold.

Also, the fact that it was written in first person present was a major turn off for me at first. But I was determined to read it, so I plowed through the next five chapters.

And then I was hooked.

If there's one word to describe this book, it's suspenseful. There is almost no way you can't read it in one sitting.

From the moment the tributes enter the arena to begin the Hunger Games, the action is nonstop. I stayed up much too late flipping each page quickly with no thought of putting it down. There were several heart-stopping moments (no, no, no, this can't be happening!) and almost the entire part of the arena is edge-of-your-seat action. At some parts I remember thinking (my heart pounding) how on earth is she going to get out of this? Or, run, Katniss, run!, or oh no, they're coming!


And when I say it's edge-of your-seat thrilling, I do mean edge-of-your-seat. Like, if you go watch the movie then expect to fall out of your chair. I just know there's going to be at least two or three of those parts where everything goes quiet before someone jumps out of the bushes. I will scream.

But back to the book. It's a hard book to review, because there's really not much you can say without giving the plot away. I can say it was suspenseful, and it was thrilling, and I didn't really like Katniss until the end, and that I liked Peeta from the beginning. That it's excellent storytelling, and that I could see everything that was happening so clearly that I'm excited to see what the movie portrays it as. Actually, from what I've seen in the trailer, it looks very close to what I imagined.

But I think that, without giving it away, I can also talk about the violence. I knew from the premise (twenty-four kids get stuck in an arena and are forced to kill each other) that it was going to involve death. I guess I just didn't expect how much there would actually be. We don't see every one of the tributes die, but the ones we do see are either very sad or somewhat gruesome. Katniss is not cold or callous to the deaths, which is good, although having grown up watching the Hunger Games, like she has, I don't quite see how you couldn't be.

Of course, there's the dilemma of the morality of killing to stay alive. There can only be one winner of the Hunger Games, which means every other contestant is an enemy. Everyone must be dead for one to live. It's this kind of suspense that drives the book. Everyone's out to get Katniss. It also left me thinking - what would I do in this kind of situation? Most likely I would try to hide somewhere until everyone else had been killed. I don't think I could kill anyone. Not even to win.

With the dilemma in mind, I liked the theme that Peeta brings up.

      I want to do something to show them [the Capitol] that they don't own me.

What's interesting is that the whole point of the Hunger Games is for the Capitol of Panem to show the other districts that they are in charge. That they can murder their children any time they want, and they enjoy watching them die. That the districts should not, and cannot rebel. It's almost an Assyrian way of government.

Most likely in our lifetimes, civil disobedience will never bring as grave consequences as the one the children in the Hunger Games faced. But it's good to ponder what we would do if we had to face such a choice - conscience against survival. We are not owned by the government. As Christians, we are redeemed by the blood of Jesus, and our citizenship is in Heaven. We cannot serve two masters, and to fully serve one we must sometimes disobey the other, insofar as their decrees contradict those of our true masters.

It's good to think of in the light of the recent contraception mandate controversy. Here are Catholic Bishops who would rather disobey the government then violate their consciences. It's sad, because it should not happen in a country that values religious freedom. We've been blessed to be free from this kind of tyranny. But if it does come to that choice, if we do have to choose between obeying the government and doing what we know to be wrong, or disobeying and risking the government's wrath, I hope we're prepared for that choice. The Hunger Games, though it never provides a direct answer to that question - what should a right thinking person do in that situation? - is a good start to thinking about and pondering this dilemma.

I haven't read the entire series yet - I'm still trying to find a copy of Catching Fire, the second one - so I can't comment on the trilogy as a whole. But I can recommend the first one. It's a thrilling, suspenseful read, and a thought-provoking one as well.

(You can read my review of Mockingjay here.)

If you still aren't convinced that you should read the book, then watch this trailer. It's very well-done, and just might change your mind. Oh, and the actor who plays Gale is the younger brother of Chris Hemsworth (Thor!)

Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Review: The Last Olympian

The Last Olympian
The Last Olympian by Rick Riordan

My rating: 4 of 5 stars



I wanted to read this book slowly. I didn't want the series to end, or to leave Percy. But I had to find out how everything was resolved. I was hoping that Percy would live, that Luke would be redeemed, that Grover would achieve his purpose, that Annabeth would (finally) figure out who she really loved, and that Kronos would be defeated (practically a given, but still...)

Well, the book didn't disappoint. The action was a little slower than in other books (because there were more battle scenes, all in one place), but the tension was kept up until the very end. There were at least three important deaths, lots of backstory, and one thrilling resolution. The humor persisted throughout the book, putting hilarious twists on even the darker scenes.

My only complaints: the book ruined my two favorite mythological heroes, Sysiphus and Prometheus. Also, Percy encourages the gods to take responsibility for their children; not a bad thing in itself, but it seems to also paint ther continually having illegitimate kids as a good, or at least not a shameful, thing. And then, of course, the whole Greek gods/ illegitimate kids thing is... a bit awkward, to say the least.

But Percy is an amazing protagonist. He's funny, smart (but sometimes clueless) and just overall a likable guy. I liked him better than I ever liked Harry (although that could be due to the series being written in the first person).

Overall, it was an amazing series, one that'd I highly recommend to anyone who wanted a good, funny fantasy story, and a thrilling read.

I might look into Rick Riordan's other Camp Half-Blood series, although I don't think it will be the same without Percy's wonderful narration.

View all my reviews

Monday, January 16, 2012

Review: The Lightning Thief

The Lightning Thief
The Lightning Thief by Rick Riordan

My rating: 3 of 5 stars



Percy Jackson is a kid who has ADHD, dyslexia, and has gone to six boarding schools in six years. He lives with his mother and his stepfather, since his real father left before he was born. He attends a school for "challenged" kids - a school which he's about to be expelled from... again. But then his math teacher turns out to be a monster - literally - and Percy is thrust into a world he never knew existed - the world of Greek mythology.

I enjoyed this book, more than I was expecting to. There were quite a few laugh-out-loud funny parts. Percy, the narrator, has a really great voice. The author was really great at turning sad/dramatic/gory moments into comically funny ones with one little surprising twist, which steered it away from melodrama.

Of course, being about Greek mythology, it had the Greek gods in it. So, of course, I found some of it to be iffy. For example, when Percy is told that there are Greek gods, he asks, "You mean God exists?" and the centaur, Chiron, says "Well now....God - capital G, God. That's a different matter altogether. We shan't deal with the metaphysical." Which, of course, is wrong. God isn't an abstract matter, but is real - more real than any of us. Also, expressed in the book was the idea that "works" could get you to Heaven... or, in this case, Elysium. People were "tried" in the courts of judgement to see if they had done enough good deeds to go to Heaven. This obviously goes completely against Christian faith.

But, for all of those faults (which I wasn't surprised to find, knowing the subject matter) It was quite a funny book. If you've ever been interested in Greek mythology, I would recommend it for the amusing twists it puts on it. Overall, not as good as Harry Potter, and I don't know if I'll read the next one, or even all of them, but it was a much better book than I was expecting.

View all my reviews

Thursday, January 5, 2012

Review: Characters in Action

Characters in Action
Characters in Action by Marsh Cassady

My rating: 3 of 5 stars


I picked up this book because I was hoping for a more in-depth look at developing characters, like Linda Seger's Creating Unforgettable Characters. It's actually a book on creating characters for plays, so that was a little bit disappointing. However, it did turn out to be a fairly good book on play writing. I would recommend Building Your Play by David Rush before I would recommend this, but it was an amusing book.

View all my reviews

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Review: Death Cloud

Death Cloud
Death Cloud by Andy Lane

My rating: 2 of 5 stars



Death Cloud was rather disappointing. I picked it up because it's the only teen series endorsed by the Sir Arthur Conan Doyle Estate, but it didn't live up to what I was expecting.

It follows the adventures of a 14 year old Sherlock Holmes. He is sent by his brother Mycroft to live at Holmes Manor with his uncle Sherrinford Holmes (which was actually Arthur Conan's Doyle's original name for Sherlock). While there he befriends a street urchin, an American man named Amyus Crowe, and Amyus's daughter Virginia. When two bodies are found dead in the village, Sherlock attempts to solve the murders. This leads him from a creepy mansion on the edge of town, to the dirty streets of London, all the way to France. He uncovers and foils the plot for world-domination of a villain with an odd deformity.

Most of the dialogue was stiff, cliched, and forced. Sherlock as a character was boring. The main love interest, Virginia, was way too independent for her time - even though the book tried to explain it by repeatedly reminding us that she was from America. The villain was extremely disappointing and unbelievable. The housekeeper at Holmes Manor was confusing. About every ten pages we were told "she is no friend to the Holmes family," but the reason was never developed. I'm guessing that it'll be saved for another book, but it was distracting. The entire plot was far-fetched.

On the whole, a rather disappointing read.

Though the author did include little nods to the actual stories, they were few and far apart.



View all my reviews

Review: Beginnings, Middles & Ends

Beginnings, Middles & Ends
Beginnings, Middles & Ends by Nancy Kress

My rating: 4 of 5 stars



This book gives clear, helpful tips on writing beginnings, middles, and ends. The section on beginnings was very thought provoking, and the section on middles delivered some useful advice for anyone who's ever been stuck in the middle of a story (or, in my case, in the middle of multiple stories). I'll definitely be putting the advice in this book to practical use.

View all my reviews

Review: The Elements of Mystery Fiction: Writing a Modern Whodunit

The Elements of Mystery Fiction: Writing a Modern Whodunit
The Elements of Mystery Fiction: Writing a Modern Whodunit by William G. Tapply

My rating: 3 of 5 stars



A fairly good introduction to writing basic mystery fiction. My only two problems with it were the repeated (and annoying) use of the pronoun "she" to refer to the sleuth and "he" to refer to the villain (is the author saying women can't be villains?) and a few spots with bad language (mostly in the excerpts from published mystery books).

The section on collaborations was especially interesting.

View all my reviews
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...